Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 4:41:50 GMT
How many people can one person communicate with before his brain smokes? This figure amounted to an average of 150 contacts. If you've read Malcolm Gladwell's bestseller The Tipping Point, you probably remember the importance of the number 150. This is the so-called "Dunbar number," named after the anthropologist who predicted the size "tribes" where we can comfortably communicate. This figure was based on the size of the human brain compared to other primates and the average size of their group. It turns out that we can communicate comfortably only in groups of no more than 150 people. And so it has been since ancient times, when humanity still lived in the African savannas. This number is used by armies, visionary corporations, not to mention wedding planners.
Facebook or Twitter - too. research from Indiana University leads if you are a very sociable person, still Panama Phone Number ask yourself - how many of these acquaintances on Facebook really deserve the honorary title based on the size of the human brain compared to other primates and the average size of their group. It turns out that we can communicate comfortably only in groups of no more than 150 people. And so it has been since ancient times, when humanity still lived in the African savaof "friend"? If social media could rewire our brains, we might one day live in this utopian world where technology connects everyone with meaningful relationships. us to the conclusion that this will never happen. The authors explain it as follows: calculators are great tools for calculations, but they cannot turn us into mathematical geniuses. They do not extend the natural limits of our brain.
Maybe that's even a good thing. But what social networks give us is the opportunity to choose a group from these 150 people. Instead of being trapped in a village, as has happened throughout history, we have made our own v based on the size of the human brain compared to other primates and the average size of their group. Apparently, turns out that we can communicate comfortably only in groups of no more than 150 people. And so it has been since ancient times, when humanity still lived in the African savairtual villages that suit us personally. We made these "villages" out of family, friends, colleagues and teachers, and even those people with whom we somehow met on the weekend. In general, the sense is that this circle does not make sense to expand. For example, a popular iPhone application called Path limits the number of your contacts to only five dozen people. only when we are on a network that forcibly limits the number of our contacts to 150 people will we be able to see a real map of the world.
Facebook or Twitter - too. research from Indiana University leads if you are a very sociable person, still Panama Phone Number ask yourself - how many of these acquaintances on Facebook really deserve the honorary title based on the size of the human brain compared to other primates and the average size of their group. It turns out that we can communicate comfortably only in groups of no more than 150 people. And so it has been since ancient times, when humanity still lived in the African savaof "friend"? If social media could rewire our brains, we might one day live in this utopian world where technology connects everyone with meaningful relationships. us to the conclusion that this will never happen. The authors explain it as follows: calculators are great tools for calculations, but they cannot turn us into mathematical geniuses. They do not extend the natural limits of our brain.
Maybe that's even a good thing. But what social networks give us is the opportunity to choose a group from these 150 people. Instead of being trapped in a village, as has happened throughout history, we have made our own v based on the size of the human brain compared to other primates and the average size of their group. Apparently, turns out that we can communicate comfortably only in groups of no more than 150 people. And so it has been since ancient times, when humanity still lived in the African savairtual villages that suit us personally. We made these "villages" out of family, friends, colleagues and teachers, and even those people with whom we somehow met on the weekend. In general, the sense is that this circle does not make sense to expand. For example, a popular iPhone application called Path limits the number of your contacts to only five dozen people. only when we are on a network that forcibly limits the number of our contacts to 150 people will we be able to see a real map of the world.
we need more members on this forum... 
